Course Evaluation
Term: Spring 2011
Course: MKTG 649, Section 4 Marketing Management
Filtered On: MKTG 649, Section 4 Marketing Management, MKTG 860, Section 2 Strategic Mktg
Responses: 12 out of 30 (40.0%)
Surveys filled out: 12
| Question | Statistics | |
| The instructor defined the course objectives, learning activities, requirements and grading policies clearly in the syllabus. 1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree | Mean | 1.583 |
| The course was organized in a way that helped my learning. 1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree | Mean | 1.917 |
| The instructor created experiences that stimulated my learning. 1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree | Mean | 2.250 |
| The instructor provided helpful and timely feedback on my performance and progress throughout the semester. 1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree | Mean | 1.750 |
| The instructor was open to a variety of points of view. 1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree | Mean | 1.727 |
| When I consider the contribution to my learning, this instructor's teaching was: 1: Highly Effective - 5: Ineffective | Mean | 1.833 |
| My overall evaluation of this instructor 1: Excellent - 2: Good - 3: Average - 4: Substandard - 5: Poor | Mean | 2.000 |
| The most effective attributes (characteristics) of the instructor's teaching were: |
| he actively listens to everything we say and answers all of our questions completely. he uses a format that will teach us the concepts we want to learn about or have questions about. he doesn't just blindly and boringly goes over the slides. |
| open minded |
| Sengupta is an amazing professor!! |
| knowledgable |
| Articulation, excitement, and impartiality. |
| i learn how to do the best marketing plan |
| Feedback |
| short essay exam |
| Those attributes of this instructor's teaching which I think should be improved are: |
| more structure to the class. For example adding classwork |
| none |
| None |
| none |
| Creativity in making the course more interesting |
| more group exercises |
| The course could be improved by: |
| less intensive lectures too much information in one class |
| none |
| None |
| none |
| Flexibility of material |