|
Course Evaluation |
|
Term: Spring
2007 Course: MKTG 0860, Section
01 STRATEGIC MARKETING |
|
Responses: 22 out of 36 (61.1%) |
|
|
|
Knowledge of marketing. Marketing stories
very open, encouraging the students to
stay in touch with the real business life |
|
-news items |
|
-discussions |
|
The content of the class. The professor
was very precise and provided interesting examples from the business World |
|
nothing |
|
Lots of discussion about current event |
|
|
|
broad knowledge integration of course readings,
presentations, projects, and case studies was helpful and kept things
interesting He is very passionate about marketing and
used a variety of teaching methods. Group projects, Power Point, and recent
articles. Using a lot of real world examples and
interesting case studies. Giving a lot of helpful advice on students comments
on iLearn and in class. good class discussions He is knowledgable in marketing and
encourage students to talk more and think out of box. high expectations, current events were
important to the classroom experience, knowledgeable about real world
applications of our the coursework friendly, motivating, knowledgeable |
|
|
|
The case studies were confusing at first |
|
-cover better on textbook materials |
|
For the cases, I wish I could have more
personal feedbacks on the content of my papers. The grade is not sufficient
to tell me where I have to improve. Long winded and boring. Project was pure
waste of time Put too much impact on the project (most
of the grade), it would be better if the grade was to distribute more evenly give fair chance for all the students to
speak at class i think some of the students are
struggling with sitting for long periods of time after working all day.
really brief breaks might revive people and keep participation levels up
Because of his passion for marketing he often did not listen or respond to
other's points of view. It would have been helpful if he had. describe the "case method" of analysis
more clearly in the beginning of the semester... people were caught a little
off guard and then it was too late to make up the points. none. |
|
|
|
evaluate the online contribution on a
weekly base, not only by the activity of the day the class takes place Nothing Have test! Every class start with
discussion and then lecture. However, there's no test, so there's no
incentive to be in class. The project takes up 2/3 of the grade, which I
don't think it's effective to |
|
stimulate students to learn the
textbook.. |
|
define all the homework more clearly maybe offer a few marketing plans
samples, or excerpts of how each chapter contributes to an actual plan
throughout the semester would help to build a physical example I think it was a great course and it
doesn't need to be improved! Maybe one more guest speaker session Written assignments were too early. Sanjit is one of the best instructors
i've had at SFSU or any institution for that matter. course is very hands on, I don't think
there can be further improvements. |
|
|