Course Evaluation

Term: Fall 2007

Course: MKTG 865, Section 1
Seminar in Marketing Management

Responses: 11 out of 16 (68.8%)
Surveys filled out: 11


Question Statistics
The instructor defined the course objectives, learning activities, requirements and grading policies clearly in the syllabus.
1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree 		Mean 1.182
The course was organized in a way that helped my learning.
1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree 		Mean 1.273
The instructor created experiences that stimulated my learning.
1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree 		Mean 1.182
The instructor provided helpful and timely feedback on my performance and progress throughout the semester.
1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree 		Mean 1.455
The instructor was open to a variety of points of view.
1: Strongly Agree - 5: Strongly Disagree 		Mean 1.455
When I consider the contribution to my learning, this instructor's teaching was:
1: Highly Effective - 5: Ineffective 		Mean 1.455
My overall evaluation of this instructor
1: Excellent - 2: Good - 3: Average - 4: Substandard - 5: Poor 		Mean 1.091

The most effective attributes (characteristics) of the instructor's teaching were:
encouragement of real-world situation/current events
He focused more on directing the theory to our own experiences professionally, citing examples of the companies we are employed by often. It was a comfortable and interactive atmosphere and the case studies and projects are exactly what a marketing course should have lots of.
keeping us posted on news in the business world
He integrates comedy intelligently. He also keeps up to amazing speed on everything innovative.
very concerned about students
very engaging
timely feedbacks
Encouragement of open discussion which makes the lecture a lot more interesting
rich update-to-date high tech marketing and technology information
current business trend discussions, very useful and interesting, engaging
Very well prepared for the class
Well organized
Challenging Assignments

Those attributes of this instructor's teaching which I think should be improved are:
none
His syllabus was off on the dates and hard to follow on some assignments. Also, if he felt very passionately about a certain perspective, anyone with an opposite perception felt a little uncomfortable in voicing it or arguing it further.
n/a
Need more direction on assignments
not really

The course could be improved by:
none
We didn't have any exams on the book which made it hard finding the urgency in reading it.
Course itself was great, just the room we had to take it was not supporting the learning process at all
n/a