
Outline (c) 1997-98 Robert H. Daniels

1. Costs of doing business: Overview:
We move from "what is Y" and "Whose Y" to "What offsets allowed?"
Sec. 162 is basic "costs of business" section:
212 parallels for costs of non-biz income (landlord, investor)
most sched "C" categories are IRS examples of Sec 162
Note use in setting up small biz chart of accounts
Extensive Explanation in Regs and Case law
Stemming mostly from 1 sentence of 162
2. Elements of Sec. 162
Ordinary and Necessary
- Expenses
- Paid/incurred
- Carrying on
- Trade or business
Specific Rules
- 162(a)(1) Specific rule for reasonable compensation
- 162(a)(2) Specific rule for travel away from home
- 162(a)(3) Specific rule for business rentals
Other subsections of 162
3. Ordinary and Necessary
Leading Case Welch v. Helvering
Facts: T is secretary of corp, which goes bankrupt
To reestablish relations, T pays co's debts.Issue: Deductible? Holding: No
Reasoning:
Was "necessary": "appropriate and helpful"
Ordinary not mean daily: can be only once per business
W/in ordinary norms of conduct
What Tp did was "extra-ordinary""THe standard set up by the statute is not a rule of law. It is rather a way of life. Life in all its fullness must supply the answer to the riddle"
Critique: if not an expense, what is it?
Capital? (goodwill?) when recover the asset? (assets are future costs).
Note: courts may say " no deduction -- capitalize"
That's a question of the timing of the deduction.
Lawyers think that saying something is "charged to capital" is meaningful.
No -- that just says: debit an asset account.
Doesn't say what to do with the account then.
An "asset" is not a thing -- it is an accounting abstraction
4. Expenses
Current as opposed to capitalized
Two Cases: Midland Empire and Mt. Morris Drive In
Facts: ME lines basement of 25 yr old packing plant
vs. new problem of oil leakageIssue: repair/expense or capital? Held Repair
Reasoning:
is ordinary and necessary
in order to continue existing operations
xx regs.: not add to value or extend lifeProblem: Mt. Morris similar, tho there it was flow out
threat of a nuisance suit
and flow prevention held to be capitalBig issue now: environmental remediation and negative IRS rulings
5. Paid or incurred
6. Carrying on
if extending existing biz, expense whether or not go forward
7. Trade or business
Not just self-employed or corps: business of being an employee
Highly judgmental: an undefined bedrock concept
eg. groetzinger -- the business of gambling on dog races
Do you need customers? Full time investor vs broker?
8. Sec. 162 Specific Rules
162(a)(1) Specific rule for reasonable compensation
Generally comes up in context of closely held, or family
Smith case
Facts: S managed casino he'd built up, tho owned by sons
S got % of profits since 1/41. Written contract
Business grew, and $$ got large
Competitors said it was "reasonable"Issue: does co deduct? Held: no
Reasoning: Regs. 1.162-7:
a contingent %%, even if it grows large, is OK if free bargain
Not a free bargain due to father's domination of sons
Even tho they were adult"Parachute payments": Sec. 280G
162(a)(2) Specific rule for travel away from home
Rosenspan case
Facts: R was jewelry salesman 300 days /yr traveling
in NY at co offices 5-6 times / yr
Used brother's residential address, voted
but actually stayed at hotelIssue: is R's employer's location R's "tax home"
Held: not the correct issue:
R has no home in the ordinary sense of the wordReasoning: note the R is trying to turn IRS rule against IRS
162(a)(3) Specific rule for business rentals
Starr's Estate case
Regs. 1.162-5: Specific Rule for Continuing Education
Distinguish better in same job vs. qualify for new job
Miscellaneous Deductions under Sec. 162
1.162-4 incidental supplies
1.162-6 professional expenses, books and furniture
For employer expense reimbursement, cross reference 1.62-2
"accountable plan"
9. Other Subsections of Sec. 162
162(c) bribes and illegal payments
no deduction for corrupting govt official
what if company pays off customs in Shanghai?
no deduction for commercial bribe, if illegal under enforced law162(e) lobbying
1993 change: now no deduction for "influencing legislation" or "direct communication with "covered" executive branch official"
exception for local legislation and for $2K in-house
162(f) fines and penalties paid to government
162(l) self-employed health insurance
40% of amount is adjustment to Y (rest is med deduction)
100% in 2002162(m) executive pay over $1mm
applies to CEO and other 4 highest paid of public companies
exception for performance based compensation
Build date 2/21/98