
Directions in Tax practice
Outline (c) 1997-98 Robert H. Daniels

![]()
The Alternative Minimum Tax
Policy background
1969 study: about 400 Tps over $200K AGI no tax liability
less than meets the eye: casualty, investment interest, foreign tax credit
various approaches in 1970s.
the "minimum tax" didnt work, so created the "Alt" min tax in 1982
greatly broadened and expended in 1986
goal: to shut loopholes, and also a short term revenue fix
Mechanics
Section 55: calculate alt tax on alt income:
pay the difference as AMT if total is higher
Individuals: AMTI * 26% 1st 175K, 28% excess
AMTI = redefined Y less 45K joint, 33.750 single
AMT exemption phaseout
Tricky trap: lose ¼ when AMTI over 150K/112.5K
Effect: Y up 100, exempt down 25. 1.25x 26% = effective 32.5% rate
Tax Credits limited
Only get the "alternate minimum foreign tax credit"
Other credits are deferred or lostHow income is redefined
Change in 1997 to keep 10%/20%/28% cap gains rate
tho cap gains can still hurt on the phaseout
Dont allow certain deductions: "exclusion preferences"
State taxes (what about state tax refunds. Income?
- Misc itemized deductions
- Medical under 10% (not 7.5%) AGI
- Home mortgage only primary residence
- no home equity debt unless taken out before 1982
- Investment interest limit: recompute investment Y
- Oil Depletion
- No exclusion for "private activity" muni bonds
Change the timing of other items
MADS depreciation: so gain on sale of property differs
- Uniform Capitalization: depr as an inventory factor
- Alternative operating loss carryover calculations
- ISOs: the bargain taxed on option exercise
- various other amortization differences
Tax planning and AMT
Who pays it?
1996: 453,000 individual returns, $2.4 bb
High income (because of 33K exclusion, tend to be over $100K
pattern of deductions that are preferences - eg. State tax
ISO recipients w/o a *lot* of tax planning
example:
mfj wages 160K, CA tax 15K, Misc itemized 40K
regular taxbl Y roughly 100K for 23K tax
AMTI is 160 - 42.5 (phaseout) * 26% = 30KSoon will be a much bigger problem: 2 reasons
the AMT exemptions and breakpoints arent indexed
A lot of credits reduce regular tax, but not below AMT
eg. 1998 child cr, care cr. Wages 160, CA 15, MID 15K
regular tax now 30.5K
suppose 2 ch, $400 ea and $960 care cr.How to plan: the concept of "crossover"
(graph distributed in class)
Tax planning aims for crossover
if AMT > regular tax, deductions are wasted
Rocket science: the AMT credit
Sec. 53: a recursive definition
"the minimum tax credit for any taxable year is the excess (if any) of--
(1) the adjusted net minimum tax imposed for all prior taxable years beginning after 1986, over
(2) the amount allowable as a credit under subsection (a) for such prior taxable years."
"Adjusted net minimum tax" means AMT - (AMT due to preference items alone)
Policy: so Tp wont be hurt as timing items reverse
So: "AMT created by timing items in year 1, to the extent exceeding regular tax, can reduce regular tax in year 2, but not below (the greater of) year 2s AMT or year 2s AMT due to preference items alone.
|
|
|
Build date 5/18/98