Bio.Sim Study Observations and Recommendations
Using a Computer Simulation to Refine Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the XM94 Long Range Biological Standoff Detection System
By
William A. McCullough
Matthew V. Belote
US Army Soldier, Biological and Chemical Command
Program Director for Biological Defense
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5423
(410) 436-5782/5675
wamccull@cbdcom.apgea.army.mil
mvbelote@cbdcom.apgea.army.mil
With
V. James Cannaliato
US Army Soldier, Biological and Chemical Command
Program Director for Biological Defense
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5423
(410) 436-5639
vjcannal@cbdcom.apgea.army.mil
Michael J. O’Connor
ITT Systems
600 Boulevard South, Suite 208
Huntsville, AL 35802
(256) 650-2732
michael.oconnor@ssc.de.ittind.com
Dennis L. Jones
ITT Systems
2560 Huntington Avenue
Alexandria, VA 22303
(703) 329-7181
dennis.jones@ssc.de.ittind.com
Dr. Paul A. Beckman
Institute for Defense Analysis
1801 N. Beauregard Street
Alexandria, VA 22311-1772
(703) 845-2493
Abstract: The paper describes observations that the authors made during a study to refine and develop tactics, techniques, and procedures for the XM94 Long Range Biological Standoff Detection System. The XM94 is the only standoff detector for biological agents currently in use by the U.S. Army. The study used computer simulations rather than actual flight missions to gather its data. The authors provide a set of recommendations for consideration by the community.