|
The dawn of the 20th century marks a pivotal point in
Colombia's history. As the "Thousand Day War" reached its bloody end
in 1902, the Conservative Party realized political dominion of the nation,
united forces with the Catholic church, and subordinated the Liberal
Party to a peripheral role in the formation of a modern national consciousness
(Sharpless 11). Constructing a one-sided history as a means of empowerment,
the Conservative Party administered an authoritarian model of rule,
while speaking of "democracy" and "modernization" in Colombia. Infrastructures
such as railroads and communication began to web across the topography,
and the cultivation of café suave, oil, bananas, and rubber became the
material supply of their modern import/export economy (the indigenous
population was recruited as a labor class).
Reaching an apex of importance in the 20th century, issues
of territory, geography, and memory, or as Edward Said has recently
called it, "a study of human space," has become the crucial factor in
creating a modern national consciousness (Said 175). I aim to lay out
how conceptions of history and memory in Europe were reaching a peak
of importance, and how these ideologies were interpreted and manifested
in Colombian society, as the nineteenth century approached its crepuscular
years.
In his inclusive Myths and Memories of the Nation,
Anthony Smith illuminates the budding importance of cultural myths of
origin, ethnic descent, golden ages, and location essential to the nation
building process (Smith 63). Smith defines the nation as "a named human
population sharing a historic territory, common myths and historical
memories, a mass, public culture, a common economy and common legal
rights and duties for all members" (Smith 11). Using this definition,
I am interested in looking at some of the historic territory and common
myths of Colombia, and in making an attempt to unpack some of the differences
as well as similarities between the 'official' history of Colombia and
the indigenous version.
Using Smith's nation types, I will try to demonstrate
how the Colombian nation straddles two opposed yet nevertheless incomplete
"nations" within one nation. In light of Smith's study, Colombia's official
nationalism seems to fit into the category of the "modernist," "socio-economic
type," indebted largely to authoritarian, military power (Smith 6).
In direct response to this, Colombia's indigenous communities, despite
many tribes' long history of violent disputes, have begun to utilize
radio and print technology to join forces politically, and protect their
land rights and culture from the control of the dominant society. Together
these indigenous ethnic communities are beginning to form their own
"primordial," "natural," and "ethnic" nationalism that, while "forgotten
and silent perhaps," are "continuing to exist beneath the debris of
history" (Smith 4). My interest is ultimately to probe into how a nation
can create and uphold a single national consciousness despite vast cultural
diversity.
Smith describes "ethnoscapes" as "poetic and historic
landscapes," in which a community links a collective memory with an
ancestral territory or "homeland," "thereby binding their descendents
to a distinct landscape endowed with ethno-historic significance" (Smith
151). We now will take an excursion through the Colombian ethnoscape
at the entrance of the twentieth century, from the high peaks of the
capital's Andes, through the dusty mestizo plains, and into the thick
uncharted and indigenous Amazon, in order to better understand the complexities
that Colombia faces in the creation of a single national consciousness.
The Highland (Los Andes)
Nestled between the granite peaks of the Andes, by 1957
the city of Bogotá held 98% of Colombia's inhabitants (Fluharty 7).
This figure makes me wonder if it includes the inhabitants of the Amazon.
Both the capital of the nation as well as the topographic locus of the
official national consciousness, this "Little Athens" prides itself
on its European intellectuality and modernization. "The old folklore
says that it is so sophisticated that even the bootblacks read Proust"
(Gunther 432). History books pay homage to this majestic landscape as
the "high heartland of the nation," where "in these great intermountain
basins large cities have grown up, and commerce and industry, the arts
and crafts, science and learning, have flourished" (Fluharty 6). High
in these mountains lie the nation's "sights of memory," as Smith expounds:
"the fields of battle, the monuments to the fallen, the places of peace
treaties" (Smith 152).
Atop four nearby peaks in the familiar South American
manner stand four monuments illuminated at night, including the celebrated
church (Monserate), a cross, and a figure of Christ somewhat like the
one in Rio (Gunther 466).
The antiquity of these granite peaks as well as their
soaring altitude above the capital gives these national symbols a sense
of age-old wisdom as well as a daunting authority. Religious, political,
and national monuments, like the Monserate, the Museo del Oro (Museum
of Gold), and the Bank of the Republic, were being constructed feverishly
around the turn of the century in an attempt to link themselves through
collective memory to this colonized land. In his essay "Invention, Memory,
and Place," Edward Said examines geography as "a socially constructed
and maintained sense of place," and further cites this as the foundational
ingredient on which national consciousness can be built (180). The process
of linking collective myths, memories, and histories to this particular
landscape was an age-old endeavor for the highland indigenous populations
(such as the Páez, Vintonco, Pitayo, and the Gumbiano), but has become
much more complex in the post-colonial epoch.
At the twentieth centennial dawn, the political system
of this grand capital had recently been classified as a "sectarian democracy"
in which "the rule of one party," in this case the conservatives, "has
meant the almost total exclusion of the other form of government" (Kline
15). The patrimonial division of power was, at this point, distributed
down from the federal government to the "natural-chiefs" or gamonales,
and further down to the plantation or hacienda owners who controlled
the commerce of the land's natural resources (Kline 19). Excluded from
the picture altogether is the indigenous population, who were used
as mass labor for the plantations. The Páez customarily cultivated cocoa,
manioc, maize, and potatoes, but were forced to work as tenant farmers
on coffee and sugar plantations from the 17th century on (Rappaport
8).
A socio-economic official nationalism forms at this point
in place and time, in the footsteps of European modern nations where
"the economic and political cores continually exploit the resources
of the periphery, breeding a nationalist reaction to imperialism or
internal colonialism" (Smith 6). This "uneven spread of capitalism"
must be backed up by national myths, memories, and monuments that are
linked to a new "homeland" (Smith 6).
Indigenous to Colombia's highlands, the Páez people have,
in the last century, adapted their age-old oral history technique in
direct response to dominant, official society. Throughout time, Páez
history has been transmitted through oral stories, which called on mythic
accounts of the past in order to spark social mobility in the present.
Páez history, which "makes allusions to topographic sights which would
only be understood by other Indians," and furthermore, their oral transmission,
kept them within their tribes in order to create a tribal consciousness
(Rappaport 2). Beginning at the end of the nineteenth century, the Páez
have been linked to the capital by commerce, transportation, and technology.
Páez intellectuals have, in the last century, put their historic accounts
into writing, both in the Páez language as well as Spanish, using their
past as a means of empowerment in the present, in their various confrontations
with the "Crown and State" (Rappaport 2).
Eighteenth century resguardo titles were written by caciques,
or the tribal chiefs of the Páez. A combination of information from
the pre-colonial and post-colonial eras has served
as a public account of their mythic history, both linking them to the
land and serving as a political base for their community. The
resguardos served as legal land titles, delineating their borders as
well as claiming a "historic right" to the land (Smith 69). As Smith
concludes, "ethnic myths are vital 'evidence' for territorial 'title
deeds'; a quest for a recognized homeland" (Smith 69). Páez historians
used the resguardos to continue their age-old tradition of telling history
"how it should have happened" (Rappaport 71). Don Juan Tama, one of
the Páez' most celebrated caciques, claimed to have had a "supernatural
birth," calling himself "the son of the Star of the Tama Stream" (Rappaport
72). By adopting the surname of Estrella or Star, he labelled himself
as a messianic figure. Furthermore, in his resguardo, he claims to have
killed the rival Guambiano cacique, Cálambas (Rappaport 72). Although
this account is contradicted in the Guambiano resguardo, it continues
to serve, like the looming monuments in Bogotá, as a means of empowerment
for the Páez people, fueling political action in the present.
Hasty to disregard Páez collective memory as "myth" rather
than "history" because they "do not conform to their preconceived standards
of historical expertise," Western historians have tended only to classify
Páez historic accounts as "myth," rather than incorporating them into
the nation's official history (Rappaport 14). Anthropologists have made
the distinction between "structure" and "event," in which myths are
classified as structures, while history deals with "true events" (Rappaport
14). Western chronological historical discourse may be able to defend
the validity of each "event," but what about the empty, unrecorded space
between these grand events? Can history be determined to be "true" if
it leaves out whatever does not glorify the official national image?
First we must take a look at the conceptions of memory
and history in Europe during this time. As Richard Terdiman informs
us in his essay "Deconstructing Memory," Hegel was considered the main
consecrated philosopher of history in the nineteenth century (Terdiman
14). Hegel's Philosophy of History shaped the models of nineteenth century
European historians and extended into all of Europe's colonies, including
this "Little Athens" in the Colombian Andes. With this philosophy, Hegel
strove to create a "Christian World" where the spirit of the nation
was no longer "immersed in nature" and was therefore "self-sufficient,"
and finally "free" (Hegel 131). This Eurocentric model aimed to "discover
what is essential in world history and disregard what is inessential"
(Hegel 31). Throughout the century Europe was obsessed with memory.
Terdiman describes a "memory-crisis" in which the past became fundamental
in constructing "structures and cultural 'discourses' produced out of
the past to regulate the present" (Terdiman 19). Let us now look at
some of the official memories of Colombia as well as some of the Páez
myths in hopes of discovering a "Colombian" historical consciousness.
Myths of origin in Bogotá undoubtedly received special
attention at the end of the nineteenth century, as Colombia strove to
build a national consciousness that mirrored the European examples,
as well as being uniquely Colombian. As Smith illuminates, "every nationalist
movement will produce myths of descent that are in some respects, unique"
(Smith 19). The origins of the Colombian people extend on the one hand to
Spain, and on the other to this new land that marks a "new beginning."
Bogotá's national monuments, such as the statue-topped mountains, the
football stadium, and the Museo del Oro, use both the physical topography
of the land as well as indigenous symbols to create a unique national
consciousness with roots in two lands. Describing the Museo del Oro,
John Gunther states,
It includes no fewer than 8,000 pieces of pre-Hispanic gold weighing
150,000 grams...The Indians who made these exquisite works of art reached
their peak in the 4th century A.D (Gunther 470).
This national museum both uses these indigenous ornaments
as unique national emblems and ceaselessly regards the indigenous culture
as something that exists only in the past. Commonly referred to as "Nueva
Granada" (New Granada) at the time, this new nation could not use the
traditional "tree" metaphor to trace its cultural origins solely into
the new landscape it inhabited. As Smith points out, the metaphor of a
tree, with its organic intimations, may prove problematic, especially
for communities marked by temporal or spatial discontinuities: it is
not easy to accommodate revolution and dispersion within this schema,
let alone immigration and intermarriage (Smith 65). Colombia's cultural
descent is more like an immense Banyan tree, whose branches grow out
horizontally, across seas, and drop down new roots into the ground.
Spain served as an ancestral homeland, marked by Bogotá's religious
statues, football stadium, and museum. Attempting to connect these myths
and memories to this new ethnoscape is Colombia's most challenging obstacle
in its nation building
process. In a North American historical essay, Vernon Fluharty claims
there is no homogeny in the Colombian population. The Indian as such
is disappearing. There are few pure white descendants... still and
all, it is the white element which is effective, which runs the nation
and makes the important decisions (Fluharty 20).
Throughout 'official' history found in these consecrated
texts, the indigenous communities are left out of the picture. The "pure
white" descendants that Fluharty describes were never considered "pure
white" in Spain, but a mix of ethnicities that formed the modern Spanish
nation. This Colombian 'new origin' allows new constructions to be made
in order to insure political dominance.
Páez history, like many indigenous communities in the
Americas, passes on myths of beginning that hold a sacred link to the
topography of land. Páez historians "are fully conscious of the lessons
they must draw from the memories of pre-Columbian battles with aboriginal
enemies" (Rappaprt 14). The Páez have encoded their history of land
struggles in both pre-colonial as well as post-colonial time. Orally
transmitted myths, 18th century resguardos, and modern Páez history
(both written as well as oral), serve a similar role as Bogotá's 'official'
history and national monuments to historically claim their territory.
Rappaport tells us of the Páez history: the oral tradition is encoded
in the geography of the Tierradentro, surfacing in the form of myths
and with references to sacred sites. The oral accounts also serve as
mnemonic devices for remembering resguardo boundaries, since most of
the mythological events occur along frontiers (Rappaport 24).
Twentieth century Páez historians utilize electronic recording
devices as well as the printing press to transmit their history, in
Spanish, to both the people of Colombia and the international
"pan-Indian" activist community.
Smith also points to the "Myth of the Heroic Age" as
essential in the formation of a national consciousness. "The future
of the ethnic community can only derive meaning and achieve its form
from the pristine 'golden age' when men were heroes" (Smith 65). Páez
incorporate warrior figures from a pre-Columbian 'golden age' and those
who defended their territory during the Spanish invasion of 1572, as
well as the 18th century caciques who established the resguardos through
judicial battles (Rappaport 9). As national heroes are celebrated in
the Colombian capital, the Páez also recognized the importance in paying
homage to their heroes. "Of all the fighters of the yesteryear, those who
occupy the center of the historical memory are the eighteenth century
chiefs, or caciques, who created resguardos and left behind land titles"
(Rappaport 9). These "fighters" are both warriors and intellectuals,
defending Páez territory and history monuments and myths from the threat
of the dominant society, as well as producing new myths that reinterpret
the memories of the official history.
Like Páez heroes, modern Colombian national heroes are
generally figures that either defend colonized territory, or produce
history. It is in the hands of artists and intellectuals to bridge the
tremendous cultural gap between the indigenous population and the dominant
society in order to create the "mass public culture" that is a crucial
ingredient in Smith's definition of a nation. The populist politician
Jorge Eliecer Gaitán (1898-1948) dedicated his life to this pursuit.
"What he wanted was not an aggressive European nationalism, but an integral
nationalist orientation that would defend Colombia's interests" (Sharpless
55). Bogotá lawyer and poet José Eustácio Rivera traveled
into the Colombian
plains and jungle in 1910 in response to a plea for legal services (Rausch
319). Feeling morally indebted to document the horrific exploitation
he witnessed, he wrote the novel La Vorágine (The Vortex) which not
only challenged Colombia's official history that neglected to mention
indigenous exploitation, but also created a "Colombian" persona, caught
between two worlds. In the latter half of the 20th century, Gabriel
Garcia Márquez has drawn on both the indigenous historical tradition
and European literary models to create a unified national consciousness.
He has combined non-chronological time with mythic images in order, like the
Páez storytellers, to reinterpret history.
Let's look back at Smith's definition of a nation. Although
the Páez have extensive myths and histories, they lack a "mass public
culture." Forced to work as sharecroppers on coffee and sugar plantations,
the Páez have neither the public size nor the military power to foster
a "common economy" and "common legal rights." So we see that nationalism
in 1900 Colombia, like all European colonies, relies on force, backed up
by a strong military that helps claim territory and defend official
history. We also see now that Colombia's "common myths and histories"
rely heavily on the adoption of indigenous cultural traditions (such
as the gold ornaments in the Museo del Oro) for the "territorialization
of memory," as Smith puts it, and link themselves to this new landscape
(1).
The Plains (Los Llanos)
Descending the rocky walls of the Andes into the vast
grasslands, or llanos, we are immediately taken in by their spacious
expanses. "The landscape presented by the true Llanos is grassland and
sky" (Rausch 8). Floods in the winter and paralyzing heat in the summer
give the plains fertile soil. As the Spaniards introduced horses and
cattle to the plains in the 16th century, a distinct llanero or plainsperson
culture had become consecrated by the 19th century. The llanero cowboys
were, by this time, predominantly mestizo, or of Spanish and indigenous
mix. This mestizaje or mix has produced a regional subculture or "ethnoscape,"
to use Smith's term where European and native American culture have
been fused (Rausch 11). The formerly nomadic hunting and gathering
tribe of the Guahibos cultivated crops and then moved on, leaving the
land to regenerate. They taught the Spanish to grow "yuca, plátanos
[bananas], and corn," as well as to hunt "deer, tigers, and tapirs,"
and to "build houses out of palm leaves, fashion tree-trunk boats,"
and so on (Rausch 11). The mestizo culture fused Catholic religious
beliefs with native myths to produce a truly "Colombian" ethnoscape.
The llanero has been continuously glorified by writers all over Latin
America, from Rómulo Gallegos in Venezuela to Juan Rulfo in Mexico.
The Colombian llanos at the beginning of the 20th century had little
civil presence or national control. When modernization, propelled by
export booms in tobacco, quinine, and coffee, transformed western Colombia
into the economic heartland of the nation, Casanare shared the catastrophic
decline of Boyacá, which by 1870 had become the poorest state in the
Colombian federation (Rausch 13-14).
A period of "administrative chaos" at the turn of the
century, with five reconfigurations of territory in the Llanos, has
been remembered by the llaneros as a period of especially spiteful neglect.
As the nation focused its attention on the construction of the provincial
capital of Casanare, the fundamental problems of violence and poverty
were utterly ignored. The capital of the Casanare province was moved
from Nunchía to tame to Orocué between 1889 and 1895 (Rausch 144).
The designation of the provincial capital brought with
it enhanced political status, a train of officials and their salaries,
construction of public buildings, and expanded economic opportunities
(Rausch 144).
This was the case for the few. The natives of the area
either joined this new Colombian agrarian workforce, or withdrew into
remote sections of their territory, where they lived unnoticed by the
growing economy of the western llanos. An "estimated three thousand
to thirty-five hundred Guahibos... nourished a passionate hatred of
the whites that was fully reciprocated" (Rausch 281). The nomadic Guahibos
continued to raid plantations and villages and drown cattle during the
flooding season.
The Jesuit missionaries were the main European contingent
in the llanos at this time. Most of the missions, like those of the
previous century, "suffered from isolation, a chronic lack of material
resources, and attacks by Guahibos" (Rausch 15). Between 1840 and 1900,
the Colombian government, aided by the European Jesuit order, began
to form "colegios de misiones" and "casas de escuelas" in order to
"integrate the Indians into New Granadian life" (Rausch 47).
In striking contrast to this history of violence, poverty,
and lack of political power, writers from Colombia as well as North
America at the end of the 19th century produced an "image of the merry,
picturesque cowboy" who is "completely independent, at home wherever
the setting sun might find him" (Rausch 324). The melancholic, bittersweet
llanero saturates the literature, music, paintings, and travel accounts
of the time, often playing the "tiple" (a traditional stringed instrument),
and singing romantic "coplas" (the llanero ballad) (Rausch 323). As
Smith expounds on his theoretical ethnoscape, it is "a particular historical
landscape, commemorated in monuments and chronicles and celebrated in
the epic and the ballad" (Smith 151). The early 20th century accounts
of the llanero, from Colombian writers such as Jose Maria, Sampler,
Francisco Javier Vergára and Velasco, to "yankee" writers such as H.J.
Mozáns, painted an exceedingly romantic image of the llanero's plight
against "savage nature" (Rausch 324).
While more or less accurately delineating the religious
background of the mestizo llanero, early 20th century writers created a romantically
mythic figure, whose ethnic descent as well as independent character
has come to represent the true "Colombian."
The Jungle (El Amazon)
As we enter the Amazon, the vast open sky of the llanos
becomes closed in by the thick canopies of the trees. We are also entering
an ethnoscape that, until today, has remained a truly indigenous cultural
landscape. Teeming with poisonous snakes, crocodiles, and swarms of flesh
eating fire ants, as well as malaria and beriberi, the lifestyles of
the indigenous tribes are as delicately adapted to the landscape as
the plants and animals. José Eustacio Rivera contrasts the popular European
image of the day, which portrayed the Amazon as a "tropical paradise,"
with that of an infernal green prison that, at the end of La Vorágine,
devours his protagonist.
|
¡O Selva, esposa del silencio, madre de
soledad y de la neblina! ¿Qué hado maligno
dejo prisionário en tu carcel verde? Los
pabellones de tus ramajes, como inmensa
bóveda (Rivera 189).
|
Oh Jungle, wife of silence, mother
of solitude and of mist! What
malignant fate has imprisoned me in
this green prison? The pavilions of your branches, like an immense
copula
(Trans. mine).
|
Pinioned between the Spanish Romantic tradition and the
modernist tradition, Colombian writers have designated the term "impressionism"
to describe Rivera's poetic style. Like impressionist paintings, the
use of light glows warmly from a distance, but a closer look reveals violent
and sporadic brush strokes. Rivera's jungle mixes religious images of
the pavilions and domes of Spanish cathedrals with a hellish and malignant
hardship inside the prisonlike walls of the jungle. As Rivera vigorously
portrays, the European culture does not mix with the indigenous culture,
except in a power relationship of exploitation: rubber plantations run
by whites and mestizos who enslaved indigenous people under brutal conditions,
made concubines of young native girls, and killed anyone who stood in
their way to economic wealth. Rivera's protagonist, Auturo Cova, cannot
help but document the hidden truths of the rubber camps, in hopes of
exposing these crimes to the national government. Devoured by the jungle
with the protagonist, Cova's historic documents never reach the right
hands.
The multi-ethnic Quichua people have historically intermarried
between Zaparoán, Canelos Quichua, Achuár, and Quijos Quicua people,
and have adopted the common Quichua Runa, or "Runapura" language, translated
as "Quichua Speakers Among Ourselves" (Reeve 19). The Quichua refer
to this period of their history as Caucho Uras, or "rubber times" (19).
Narrations set in rubber times, referred to as callari uras, were
contrasted to unai (mythic time-space), the undifferentiated state of
primordial beginnings (Reeve 19). A sharp contrast has been made between
huiragucha, or "non-forest-dwelling foreigner," and the runapura,
which considers the huiragucha potentially marriageable if the foreigner
adopts the Runa culture and language. Like the Páez of the Andes, Quichua
myths are perpetually told and retold orally among their people.
The Curray Runa language combines the concepts of "time"
and "space." Before the arrival of the Spanish, there was no word for
"time." The words timpu (derived from Spanish "tiempo" or "time") and
ura (derived from Spanish "hora" or "hour") have been adopted by the
Quichua to document the rubber times (Reeve 21). The Quichua divide
time and space into three concepts: mythic time-space, beginning times,
and present times. Quichua non-linear beginning times include experiences
from Runa ancestors through characters from the rubber times. A time
of incomparable change for the Quichua transformed their historical
consciousness by serving as a new beginning time: "At that point beginning
times is transformed into present times" (Reeve 25). Combining pre-Columbian
ancestral myths with accounts of the rubber merchants, or caucheros,
this new beginning serves for the Quichua as a means of empowerment,
both by laying claims to their sacred land and using pre-Columbian
heroes to set the conduct of the present. Adapted to western conceptions
of time, these new "beginning times" narratives serve as historic accounts;
whereas "mythic time" was only shared among the Runa,
and was where Runa "cultural knowledge" was passed down. Mythic time-space
is accessible through dreams and visions induced by datura, a hallucinogenic
plant native to their land. Interpreted through songs and stories, the
dreams speak of Runa encounters with supai, or non-human animal spirits,
which are only visible in the domain of mythic time-space (Reeve 26).
Contemporary Runa speak of "living simultaneously in 'two
times,' in beginning times and in present times" (Reeve 27). In her
personal accounts of living with the Runa, Mary Reeve documents an
oral narrative, spoken by a Runa historian, of the rubber times:
"How much were those balls of rubber worth? Because we were in debt they
only paid us half and we remained in debt" (Reeve 27). Speaking of the
economic exploitations of his land and people, this Runa speaker demonstrates
the manner in which his people were enslaved by always remaining in
debt to the rubber merchants.
[The cauchero had] a large gold sack, a sack of pure gold, they say that he made all
his money with rubber, then before he died, buried it near his estate.
His sons, wishing to know where it was buried, took datura, so that
the spirit-owner would show them, in a dream, the place where the
gold was buried. They did not dream with the datura. It did not cause
them to see. (Reeve 28)
The narrator uses the datura as a symbol of Runa mythic
time-space to which the caucheros do not have access. Reeve notes that
"mythic narratives attempt to resolve contradictions that exist between
social-structural principles within society" (Reeve 32). By reinterpreting
history in this fashion, this myth not only challenges Colombia's
official history of the time, which falsely documented the work conditions
as voluntary, but also serves as a link between the speaker's people and their
sacred land. Like Bogotá's monuments, rubber times narrations serve
as territorialized cultural artifacts.
In reference to Smith's definition of a nation, we see
two things. First, we see that Colombian national consciousness is utterly
indebted to indigenous traditions in order to create a uniquely Colombian
collective memory, and to link its official history to a homeland.
Second, by studying the historic traditions of Colombia's indigenous
people, we see that the orality of their myths enables them to keep
certain sacred myths, such as the Runa Mythic time-space or the sacred
beginning time myths of the Páez, to themselves only, thereby protecting
their culture from the exploitation of the dominant society. The most
striking factor to me is the observation that the indigenous communities
possess all the ingredients of a modern nation, except their own law
and economy. Thus the crucial difference between accepted modern nations
and peripheral communities, like those of the natives, is really a question of
power. Enslaved at gunpoint and robbed of land, gold, and voice, the
indigenous people were taken by force. The crucial element in the formation
of Colombia's national consciousness, as seen in these especially formative
years at the dawn of the 20th century, is military force.
Works Cited
Fluharty, Vernon Lee. Dance of Millions: Military Rule
and the Social Revolution in Colombia. Pittsburgh: University of
Pittsburgh Press, 1957.
Foucault, Michel. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice.
Trans. Donald Bouchard & Sherry Simon, Ed. Donald Bouchard. Ithaca:
Cornell University Press, 1977.
Gunther, John. Inside South America. New York:
Harper & Row, 1966.
Hegel, Georg Wilhem Fredrich. Lectures On the Philosophy
of World History. Trans. H.B. Nisbet, Ed. Johannes Hoffmeister. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 1975.
Rappaport, Joanne. The Politics of Memory: Native Historical
Interpretation in the Colombian Andes. New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1990.
. Cumbre Reborn: An Andean Ethnography of History.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Rausch, Jane. The Llanos Frontier in Colombian History,
1830-1930. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1993.
Reeve, Mary Elizabeth. "Cauchu Uras: Lowland Quichua
Histories of the Amazon Rubber Boom". Rethinking History and Myth. Ed.
Jonathan Hill. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1988.
Rivera, José Eustacio. La Vorágine.
Madrid: Catedra, 1998.
Said, Edward W. "Invention, Memory and Place." Critical Inquiry 26:2
(Winter 2000): 175-92.
Sharpless, Richard. Gaitán of Colombia: A Political
Biography. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1978.
Smith, Anthony. Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1999.
Sturges-Vera, Karen. "Historical Setting". Colombia:
A Country Study. Ed. Dennis Hanratty & Sandra Meditz. Washington
D.C.: United States Government, 1990.
Terdiman, Richard. "Deconstructing Memory: On Representing the Past and Theorizing
Culture in France Since the Revolution." Diacritics (Winter 1986): 13-36.
Back to top >
|